CAREER OPPORTUNITIES
New positions posted at  www.sthrm.com. See Employment Section

QUOTE OF THE WEEK
"People in change - successful enterprises do much better job than most in eliminating the destructive gap between words and deeds.  Deeds speak volume." 

 

The Heart of Change
John P. Kotter

WORKERS UNEASY ABOUT PAY, HEALTH CARE

Two massive, nationwide surveys reveal that employees are increasingly worried about basic economic issues, such as medical costs, retirement security, pay rate compared to cost of living and heavy workloads.

HR Solutions analyzed recurring themes in employee surveys and found that workers want:

  • Higher salaries. Pay is the number one area in which employees seek change.
  • Internal pay equity.
  • Benefit programs, particularly health, dental and paid time off. Many feel their health insurance is too expensive, especially prescription drugs.
  • Pay increase guidelines that place greater emphasis on merit.
  • Greater HR responsiveness to questions/concerns.
  • Less over-management. A common phrase seen was “too many chiefs, not enough Indians."
  • Less favoritism.
  • Better communication and availability from supervisors and upper management.
  • More manageable workloads and departments that aren't understaffed.
  • Facility cleanliness.

Meanwhile, 97% of working women are worried about the cost of health care, reports AFL-CIO, which polled 22,000 working women. Another 48% want to limit CEO pay when workers are being laid off or losing benefits, and 47% want to protect employees’ rights to pay and retirement benefits when a company goes bankrupt.

“Could working women be more loud and clear about what they want and need?” asks Linda Chavez-Thompson, executive vice president of the AFL-CIO. “Affordable health care. A paycheck that keeps up with the cost of living. A secure retirement. Quality child care."  August 17, 2006 

BenefitNews.com

back to top

In This Issue:
August 21, 2006

 

  • Workers Uneasy About Pay, Healthcare
  • Northwest Flight Attendants May Strike, Hardening Standoff
  • GM CEO: Delphi Union Talks Progressing
  • TYCO Pension Lawsuit Granted Class-Action Status
  • New Guidelines To Clarify HSA Contribution
  • Incentive Bonus Satisfies Overtime - Pay Requirements
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics Release 2005 Workplace Fatality Data
  • NASD Awards $1.2 Million to A.G. Edwards Ex - Worker In Mental Disability Case
  • Meacham V. Knolls Atomic Power
  • National Labor Relations Board V. Mickey's Linen & Towel Supply, Inc. 

Labor 

 

NORTHWEST FLIGHT ATTENDANTS MAY STRIKE, HARDENING STANDOFF

A federal bankruptcy judge's ruling that Northwest Airlines flight attendants are entitled to strike raises the stakes in a standoff that could push the nation's fourth-largest airline by traffic to the brink of liquidation.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Allan Gropper denied Northwest's plea for an injunction that would have blocked the 9,000 unionized cabin-crew members from striking. The ruling turns up the pressure on Northwest to offer the attendants a better contract or face a strike that could begin as soon as next Friday night.

Northwest said it will immediately appeal the decision and said it has "a range of contingency options" to respond, though it declined to detail them. The airline has a number of salaried personnel trained in attendant duties and more than 800 nonunion attendants based in Asia who could help out. Northwest said its customers can continue to book the airline "with confidence."

Unless it is quickly overturned or delayed by a temporary restraining order by a district court, the judge's ruling gives the flight attendants fresh leverage in their dispute with Northwest over pay and benefit cuts, and represents a big setback for Northwest Chief Executive Officer Douglas Steenland's strategy of brinkmanship with the carrier's unions.

Northwest, which is trying to emerge from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, has acknowledged that a strike -- even the Association of Flight Attendants' trademark campaign of limited, flight-by-flight walkouts -- could cripple it badly. Even intermittent strikes would snarl the airline's schedule and could unnerve travelers enough that they take their business elsewhere, robbing the company of revenue. Susan Carey August 18, 2006

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115583570671738500.html?mod=us_business_whats_news

back to top

GM CEO: DELPHI UNION TALKS PROGRESSING

General Motors Corp.'s top executive predicted Thursday that complex negotiations with parts supplier Delphi and its labor unions eventually will lead to a settlement on wage and benefit reductions.

Speaking at the Center for Automotive Research Management Briefing Seminars in Traverse City, GM Chairman and Chief Executive Rick Wagoner said an agreement would not be reached quickly.

"I think we're progressing, but it's not going to come together in the next five minutes," Wagoner said.

Troy-based Delphi is GM's largest parts supplier. It entered Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in October of last year and is seeking court permission to void its labor contracts and impose lower wages.

Delphi used to be part of GM, but the world's largest automaker spun it off into a separate company in 1999.

The talks, Wagoner said, are complex, involving GM, Delphi, multiple unions, creditors and investors.

"It's not the kind of thing in my view that we're going to be able to just, all of the sudden - voila - bring this together in a very, very short term," he said.

But Wagoner said he is confident that an agreement will be reached, avoiding a strike that could be catastrophic to GM. Tom Krisher Associated Press Writer  Associated Press FindLaw.com August 16, 2006
 

http://news.findlaw.com/ap/f/66/08-11-2006/be5700175f3c77a6.html

back to top

 

 Benefits 

 

TYCO PENSION LAWSUIT GRANTED CLASS-ACTION STATUS

People employed by Tyco International Ltd. when it was run by corrupt executives have won class action status for their lawsuit over the company's retirement savings plan.

The employees claim Tyco hid the true value of the company when offering its stock as an investment option in the plan and knew the stock was a bad investment.

Tyco argued the employees who wanted to represent the class weren't involved enough in the lawsuit and weren't typical of all employees who invested in Tyco stock because they relied on the financial information Tyco provided in differing degrees. U.S. District Judge Paul Barbadoro rejected those arguments in a ruling dated Tuesday. He said that in cases involving stock fraud and a company's failure to disclose important information, the U.S. Supreme Court doesn't require investors to prove they relied on information from the company.

The lawsuit is one of a number filed by shareholders that have been consolidated in the U.S. District Court for New Hampshire, where Tyco formerly had its U.S. headquarters. Other former stockholders, including large investment funds, were granted class status in June.

Any U.S. employee of Tyco who invested retirement savings in Tyco stock from Aug. 12, 1998, to July 25, 2002, would be eligible to share in any judgment or settlement. Getting class action status is a major legal hurdle in such lawsuits, but shareholders still must prove their claims.

Former Chief Executive Dennis Kozlowski and former Chief Financial Officer Mark Swartz were convicted last year in a New York state court of multiple counts of grand larceny, conspiracy, securities fraud and falsifying business records. Prosecutors said the two conspired to defraud Tyco of millions of dollars to fund their extravagant lifestyles. They were sentenced in September to up to 25 years in prison. A judge refused to release them on bail while they appeal.

The shareholders' lawsuits allege the company misrepresented the value of Tyco and companies it acquired under Mr. Kozlowski's leadership in a giant accounting fraud scheme.
Associated Press wsj.com  August 16, 2006

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115573640537637233.html?mod=home_law_more_news

back to top      


NEW GUIDELINES TO CLARIFY HSA CONTRIBUTIONS

The IRS recently eased the rules on comparable contributions to health saving accounts, giving employers more flexibility in offering health benefits.

Under current federal law, an employer that has made a contribution to a worker’s HSA must make a similar contribution to the HSAs of all comparable participating employees. Employers that failed to make such a contribution faced an excise tax equal to 35% of the aggregate amount contributed by the employees during that calendar year.

The new regulations, which take effect on Jan. 1, 2007, exempt employers from the comparability rule with collectively bargained employees because they are “not comparable participating employees, if health benefits were the subject of good faith bargaining between such employee representative and such employer or employees.”

What’s more, the rules provide further clarification on HSA contributions through a cafeteria plan. For example, “if employees are allowed to contribute to an HSA by salary reduction through a cafeteria plan, all employer contributions to the employee’s HSA will be treated as being made through a cafeteria plan,” thus excluding the employer from the comparability rules.

In addition, the new regulations expand categories related to high-deductible health plan (HDHP) coverage to include “self plus one, self plus two and self plus three or more.” The old rule only recognized “self-only HDHP and family HDHP coverage.”  August 17, 2006

BenefitNews.com

back to top        

 

Compensation

INCENTIVE BONUS SATISFIES OVERTIME-PAY REQUIREMENTS

An employer's production-based incentive bonus, based on the accomplishment of specific projects rather than the measurement of each employee's activity, appears to satisfy the overtime pay requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act, advised the Office of Enforcement Policy. The employer considers the incentive payment plan a nondiscretionary bonus and includes it in the calculation of the regular rate. Actually, by including the overtime premium payments already paid on the hourly wages in calculating the overtime premium owed on the bonus, the employer is paying more than is required by the FLSA.  August 15, 2006

http://hr.cch.com/netnews/payroll/current.asp

back to top        

 

OSHA

BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS RELEASES 2005 WORKPLACE FATALITY DATA

The rate of workplace fatalities in 2005 declined slightly from a year earlier, to 4.0 per 100,000, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported this month. BLS announced Aug. 10 that a total of 5,702 fatal work injuries were recorded last year, down from 5,764 in 2004. OSHA Administrator Ed Foulke said in a statement that the report is "positive news for our nation and all workers," noting the decline in fatalities among women, a drop in fatal fall injuries, and a decrease in the fatality rate among Hispanic employees. Foulke emphasized that the data also highlights areas where the agency needs to focus its resources to further reduce workplace fatalities.  August 15, 2006

QuickTakes@dol.gov

back to top        

 

Discrimination

NASD AWARDS $1.2M TO A.G. EDWARDS EX-WORKER IN MENTAL DISABILITY CASE

An arbitration panel of the National Association of Securities Dealers recently awarded more than $1.2 million to a former branch manager for A.G. Edwards & Sons Inc. who claimed the brokerage illegally demoted him after he took a medical leave for bipolar disorder.

"Victories are very rare in cases such as this one where the initial allegations included both actual disability and perceived disability," attorney Joshua Van Kampen of Fosbinder & Van Kampen said during a telephone interview. Van Kampen represented claimant Donald Allen in his Americans with Disabilities Act action.

"We also believe the substantial recovery amount is also unusual for an ADA case," the attorney added.

Allen filed a statement of claim in arbitration, the equivalent of a court complaint, against A.G. Edwards.

He said he was a branch manager for the company in Charlotte, N.C. When he joined A.G. Edwards in 1989, Allen said, he signed an investment broker agreement that required him to arbitrate all employment disputes before the New York Stock Exchange or the NASD. FindLaw.com August 15, 2006  Linda Coady, Esq., Andrews Publications Staff Writer

http://news.lp.findlaw.com/andrews/em/emp/20060815/20060815_allen.html

back to top        

 

Recent Court Cases

MEACHAM V. KNOLLS ATOMIC POWER (08/14/06 - NO. 02-7378, 02-7474)

On remand from U.S. Supreme Court, denial of post-verdict motion by defendants seeking judgment as a matter of law as to disparate-impact claims under ADEA and the state law, is vacated where plaintiffs have failed to carry their burden of demonstrating that the challenged employment practice was unreasonable.  FindLaw.com August 18, 2006

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/2nd/027378p.pdf

back to top      

NAT'L LABOR RELATIONS BD. V. MICKEY'S LINEN & TOWEL SUPPLY, INC. (08/16/06 - NO. 05-4121)

Application for enforcement of a Board order is granted where the Board did not abuse its discretion in adopting a hearing officer's recommendations that an employer's objections to a union certification be overruled.  FindLaw.com August 18, 2006

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/7th/054121p.pdf

back to top     

 

  Helpful Links

  Spam Policy

 

Government Homeland Security
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
United States Postal Service

  - Suspicious Mail Alert Poster
  - How to Identify Anthrax Hazards

How to Respond to a Suspicious Package

We value your privacy and your support. Your email address will not be sold or disclosed to any other organization.

 

  Privacy

 

If you are moving and wish to continue to receive STHRM HR ENewsletter please forward your new email address to info@sthrm.com

Subscribing and unsubscribing to STHRM HR ENewsletter is the individual responsibility of people requesting the newsletter. STHRM HR ENewsletter will not respond to unsubscribe requests sent to any email address.

We will also periodically forward you STHRM HR Alerts when significant legislation or court decisions can affect your employer relationships.

To cancel your subscription to STHRM HR ENewsletter, reply to this e-mail with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the Subject Line. To stop receiving all newsletter e-mail, reply to this e-mail with the word STOPMAIL in the Subject Line.

To read a story, click on the link. Or, if your email program doesn't support links to the Internet, please cut and paste the address, starting with "http", into a web browser such as Netscape or Internet Explorer. Be sure to highlight the ENTIRE address-line wrapping may occur.

Copyright ©2006 Shared Time Human Resources Management